<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Concept 53 - Latest Comments in Jericho</title><link>http://concept53.disqus.com/</link><description>If God is your co-pilot you're in the wrong seat...</description><atom:link href="https://concept53.disqus.com/jericho/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:54:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Jericho</title><link>http://concept53.com/2009/02/10/jericho/#comment-6196621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rick,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good article and I put a summary and link on our news portal - The Jericho&lt;br&gt;Telegraph. Feel free to keep checking our site for any updates on Jericho.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If your son isn't connected to the on-line Jericho fandom, then please tell&lt;br&gt;him about us. There are so many viewers that don't know about the movie and&lt;br&gt;the effort to bring back Jericho.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for Nielsen, they can't count! There is some good news, the track back&lt;br&gt;data from cable/satellite customers is improving every day and eventually&lt;br&gt;Nielsen will be forced to change or be taken over.  This is being done&lt;br&gt;without the monitoring that people objected to. What they want is the raw&lt;br&gt;data of how many are watching and then they want to combine that with panels&lt;br&gt;(that volunteer their information) to get a better picture of how the&lt;br&gt;programs/ads are doing. The research so far has shown that advertisers want&lt;br&gt;an audience that is invested in their program, like the Jericho fans are.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gwen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;-----Original Message-----&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;from: disqus="" [mailto:]="" &amp;lt;sent:="" wednesday,="" february="" 11,="" 2009="" 5:28="" pm="" &amp;lt;to:="" gwen@az&lt;a href="http://-technology.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="-technology.com"&gt;-technology.com&lt;/a&gt;="" &amp;lt;subject:="" [concept53]="" re:="" jericho="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;rickd335="" wrote,="" in="" response="" to="" ratkeeper:="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;yeah="" -="" some="" of="" us="" don't="" have="" nielsen="" boxes,="" and="" never="" would="" -="" &amp;lt;i="" don't="" like="" being="" monitored="" like="" that="" -="" but="" it="" was="" a="" great="" &amp;lt;series="" and="" i'm="" hopeful="" they="" can="" pull="" off="" a="" full-blown="" &amp;lt;theatrical="" release="" that="" sets="" up="" the="" story="" and="" takes="" us="" past="" &amp;lt;where="" it="" ended="" on="" tv.="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;nice="" site,="" btw="" :)="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;link="" to="" comment:="" &amp;lt;http:="" &lt;a href="http://concept53.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="concept53.com"&gt;concept53.com&lt;/a&gt;="" 2009="" 02="" 10="" jericho="" #comment-6196098="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;--="" &amp;lt;you="" may="" reply="" to="" this="" email="" to="" post="" your="" response.="" to="" turn="" off="" &amp;lt;notifications,="" go="" to="" your="" disqus="" settings="" at:="" &amp;lt;http:="" &lt;a href="http://disqus.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="disqus.com"&gt;disqus.com&lt;/a&gt;="" settings="" notifications="" &amp;lt;="" &amp;lt;=""&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ratkeeper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:54:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jericho</title><link>http://concept53.com/2009/02/10/jericho/#comment-6196098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah - some of us don't have Nielsen boxes, and never would - I don't like being monitored like that - but it was a great series and I'm hopeful they can pull off a full-blown theatrical release that sets up the story and takes us past where it ended on TV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice site, btw :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RickD335</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jericho</title><link>http://concept53.com/2009/02/10/jericho/#comment-6195114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article. The fans are stiling working hard to get more Jericho - we knwo there were more viewers than Nielsen can count!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gwen&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jericho-kansas.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.jericho-kansas.com"&gt;www.jericho-kansas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ratkeeper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jericho</title><link>http://concept53.com/2009/02/10/jericho/#comment-6194771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More than welcome, and after seeing how the various thematic elements were handled, I'll probably check out the big-screen version. I'm more than a tad disappointed that the show didn't draw a larger viewing audience (which would have kept it on the air longer, obviously), but it wasn't really a good fit for CBS, which seems to prefer dumbed-down, mass market entertainment over thought-provoking material.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The outsourcing of our intelligence and security functions to private corporations still continues, and the parallels to the show are still valid. Scary stuff...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RickD335</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jericho</title><link>http://concept53.com/2009/02/10/jericho/#comment-6193944</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your article.  Jericho may be gone for now but its passionate die-hard fan base continue to fight for its future.  There is a movie in the works and hopefully another network or cable channel will pick it up for more seasons. There is still so much more story left to tell.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azlady4</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:35:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>